Legal Opinion

State v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 21, 1989No. 2 CA-CR 88-0341PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of one count of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, cocaine, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. The court placed him on probation for four years. On appeal, appellant contends the court should have granted his motion for directed verdict because the state failed to show that he possessed a usable amount of cocaine. He also contends that the state committed fundamental reversible error in its final argument and that the court erred in not precluding evidence that he was an attorney. We affirm.

On December 30, 1983,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. PulliamArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Fisher v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DetrichArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Terrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  5. State v. BalliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API