Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Doran

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Grant, J:

Plaintiffs and defendants are the heirs at *397law of John Doran and Mary Doran, all being their children except John, who is a grandson, his father being dead. John Doran, the father, died March 28, 1882, ninety-three years old. His widow, Mary, died in 1885, aged about 80. Mr. Doran purchased the land.in controversy — 19 acres — in 1836. It was a farm, and occupied as a homestead till the time of his death. Soon after, the defendants moved to Detroit, taking their mother with them. April 17, 1879, Mr. Doran executed a deed of this land to his wife. About two weeks after, she executed a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stevens v. CastelMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Prentis v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schofield v. GoldArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  2. In Re Nickel's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Roberts v. BidwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Luhrs v. HancockArizona Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Kindley v. SprakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API