Legal Opinion

Redick v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 11, 2021No. 1:17-cv-00944Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IN RE: SMITH & NEPHEW MDL No. 2775 BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING Master Docket No. 1:17-md-2775 (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION JUDGE CATHERINE C. BLAKE THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO THE FOLLOWING CASES: Paula and Jace Redick v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00944 Phyliss Mosca v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 1:18-cv-03520 MEMORANDUM Now pending are a host of motions in limine filed by Ms. Paula Redick (“Ms. Redick”) and Ms. Phyliss Mosca (“Ms. Mosca”) (collectively, “the plaintiffs”) and by Smith & Nephew (“S&N”) in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnny C. McClain v. Metabolife International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Hollander v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. Werner v. Upjohn Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  5. Bonnie Joyce Rider v. Sandoz PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API