Legal Opinion
Thornton v. East Texas Motor Freight, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1972No. 71-1303PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, employing Rule 24(b), F.R.Civ.P., sought to intervene in a cause pending between J. D. Thornton and others against East Texas Motor Freight and Local 667 of the Teamsters Union. The motion for intervention was denied by District Judge Harry W. Wellford of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee.
Plaintiffs were employees of defendant East Texas Motor Freight, and members of the defendant union. The complaint charged the company and the union with unlawful and discriminatory practices condemned by Title…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Kathy Stupak-Thrall,plaintiffs-Appellees v. Daniel Glickman,defendants, the Wilderness Society, Proposed Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Brewer v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Brewer v. Republic Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974
- 10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 606, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,076 Frank C. Brewer, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Republic Steel Corporation, Ohio Civil Rights Commission, Applicant for Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- 4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 205, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7634 J. D. Thornton, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor-Appellant v. East Texas Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.