State v. Harlan
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McGIVERIN, Justice.
The question here is whether a “seizure” implicating the fourth amendment occurred prior to the time a police officer observed indicia of defendant’s intoxication that led to his arrest for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage (OMVUI). Defendant Terry Lee Harlan contends he was the victim of an unconstitutional investigatory stop and therefore evidence of his intoxication, including a breath test, should have been suppressed. We affirm because we conclude that no “seizure” occurred before the officer observed defendant’s condition.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Sherman Major BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- State v. GroffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- State v. WilkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Lamphere v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- State v. JordanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.