Legal Opinion
State v. Dixon
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1992No. S-90-727PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.
Defendant appeals a jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery and use of a weapon in the commission of a felony. He assigns as error the exclusion of relevant evidence, the interference with his Sixth Amendment right to confront his accusers, and the excessiveness of the sentences. We affirm.
“A ruling pursuant to Neb. Evid. R. 403 for exclusion of relevant evidence will be upheld on appeal unless the ruling is an abuse of discretion.” State v. Lonnecker, 237 Neb. 207, 210, 465 N.W.2d 737, 741 (1991).
On the evening of November 21,1989, Ed Hines, an Omaha Coastal Mart employee, was robbed at…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. John F. Hendrix, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Constantine T. KepreosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. FahlkNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BronsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MowellNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Carpenter v. CullanNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. LoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.