City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
Defendants Otis Elevator Company and United Technologies Corporation seek the imposition of sanctions pursuant to Rule 11, based upon the assertion by plaintiffs of a fraud claim which defendants contend lacked any good-faith basis in fact. Defendants have supported their application for Rule 11 sanctions with appropriate affidavits as directed by the Court. Those affidavits reflect that not only was there no factual basis for any claim of fraud in this case, but also that plaintiffs unjustifiably refused to dismiss the fraud claim, although presented by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Beg Investments, LLC v. AlbertiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Jordan v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
- King v. E.F. Hutton & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.