Legal Opinion

City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 1, 1985No. 83 Civ. 5944 (JES)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

SPRIZZO, District Judge:

Defendants Otis Elevator Company and United Technologies Corporation seek the imposition of sanctions pursuant to Rule 11, based upon the assertion by plaintiffs of a fraud claim which defendants contend lacked any good-faith basis in fact. Defendants have supported their application for Rule 11 sanctions with appropriate affidavits as directed by the Court. Those affidavits reflect that not only was there no factual basis for any claim of fraud in this case, but also that plaintiffs unjustifiably refused to dismiss the fraud claim, although presented by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Beg Investments, LLC v. AlbertiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Jordan v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
  5. King v. E.F. Hutton & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API