Legal Opinion

Smith v. Greater Amsterdam School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Montgomery County) to review a determination of respondent which discharged petitioner from his employment.

Petitioner was employed for approximately 6 or 7 years as a custodian by respondent. On February 13, 1986, a meeting was held at the office of the principal of petitioner’s building. This meeting, attended by the principal, petitioner, union represen*930tative Alexander Beauchamp and others, concerned petitioner’s grievance of a one-day suspension to be levied against him as the result…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Greater Amsterdam School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API