Legal Opinion
Chase National Bank of the City of New York v. J. Hamilton Cheston
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 20, 1947No. Nos. 178 to 193PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Rutledge :
I join in the Court’s denial of the petition for certiorari. But unusual circumstances in this case seem to call for explanation of my reasons for doing so.
The debtor has been in reorganization, pursuant to § 77 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, 11 U. S. C. § 205, since 1933. On May 1, 1944, the Interstate Commerce Commission approved the plan of reorganization involved in this proceeding. On June 15, 1945, the District Court also approved the plan. That action in turn was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 157 F. 2d 241, and this Court denied certiorari. 329 U.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Insurance Group Committee v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Cheston v. Chase Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
3Cited by4 opinions
- Texas v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Chase National Bank of the City of New York v. J. Hamilton ChestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Singleton Et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Singleton Et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1978