Legal Opinion

Meinck v. City of Gastonia

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 2, 2019No. COA16-892-2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

*461 *414 This case returns to this Court upon remand by the opinion of our Supreme Court. As stated in the Supreme Court's opinion:

Because the Court of Appeals determined that defendant was not entitled to governmental immunity, it did not address whether the trial court correctly ruled that defendant did not waive governmental immunity by purchasing liability insurance. We remand this case to the Court of Appeals to address that issue.

Meinck , --- N.C. at ----, 819 S.E.2d at 367. Pursuant to the Supreme Court's instructions, we review whether the City of Gastonia (the "City" or *415…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State Capital Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Draughon v. Harnett County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Evans v. Housing Auth. of City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Sadler ex rel. SadlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Davis v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ARTI SHARMA, INDIVIDUALLY AS SURVIVING SPOUSE OF AMIT SHARMA v. CITY OF ALPHARETTACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
  2. BROWN JR. v. CITY OF DURHAM POLICE DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
  3. SUTTON v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
  4. Sharpe v. BestDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API