Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Southland Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1982No. 8126SC530PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Plaintiffs, doing business as Fuller & Bost, a general partnership, acquired sites, built, and leased 7-Eleven stores to defendant. The course of business established by the parties required defendant to inspect and formally accept the buildings. Plaintiff Fuller testified that defendant “then preparefs] this form setting forth the terms of the lease and when the lease is to commence. This is signed, in this particular instance, by Mr. Bost and myself as lessor and I think Mr. Jack Dold, who was the Division Manager for the lessor [sic] and this triggered the rent payments.”

Pursuan…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Rose v. Vulcan Materials CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hylton v. KoontzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. B & F SLOSMAN v. Sonopress, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Brooks Distributing Co., Inc. v. PughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. House v. StokesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Purchase Nursery, Inc. v. EdgertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API