Legal Opinion

Blumenberg v. Neubecker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 26, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

While the trial court submitted both causes of action to the jury, he instructed them that if the plaintiff was entitled to recover, their verdict should be either on the first cause of action or on the second cause of action. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the first cause of action. The contract in question reads as follows: “ I, the undersigned, Archibald neubeoker, residing at 978 East 17th Street, Brooklyn, New York, do hereby retain albert glickman and Sidney blumberg of 1457 Broadway, New York, N. Y. as my representatives, to represent me in connection with the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fleischman v. . FurguesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Matter of SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Watkins v. SedberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. In re New York County Lawyers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Shedlinsky v. . Budweiser Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API