State v. Stanley
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BARKETT, Justice.
We have for review Stanley v. State, 507 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), which notes express conflict with Mitchell v. State, 458 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
In Atwaters v. State, 519 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1988), we recently held that the quantity of drugs involved in a crime cannot be used as a reason to depart from the sentencing guidelines.
Accordingly, we approve the decision of the Fifth District and disapprove Mitchell.
It is so ordered.
McDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Atwaters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Stanley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. KoopmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Sanchez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988