Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Carolina Coal & Ice Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1915PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Webb, J., at February Term, 1914, of BuN-C0MBE. Civil action. At tbe conclusion of tbe plaintiff’s evidence tbe defendant moved for judgment as of nonsuit, which motion was allowed. Tbe plaintiff excepted and appealed.

1Per curiam

The evidence is to tbe effect tbat tbe plaintiff, at tbe. time of bis injuries, was a driver of one of the coal wagons of tbe defendant, and was engaged in delivering coal about 4 miles from tbe plant of defendant. Defendant furnished plaintiff with a two-borse wagon and team of mules, but failed to provide him with a seat upon which to sit while in tbe discharge of bis duties. Plaintiff selected a piece of timber from tbe yard of defendant with which to make a seat for tbe wagon furnished by defendant, and while driving along a rough street in tbe city of Asheville, with a load, of coal to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  2. Hudson v. Charleston, Cincinnati & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. House v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Raiford v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Carter v. Cape Fear Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Luttrell v. . HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Thomas v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Wright v. Thompson & Moseley, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Robinson v. J. B. Ivey & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Watson ex rel. Watson v. Warsaw Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API