Legal Opinion

Patrick v. Patrick

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided December 23, 2005No. 03-04-00375-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.

Sophie Holland’s mil was admitted to probate. The parties interpret Ms. Holland’s will differently. Mary Patrick, a beneficiary under the will and of several IRAs, contends that the will provided specific instructions directing that estate taxes should be paid entirely out of the assets passing under the will alone and should not be proportionally assessed on funds in the IRAs. The appellees, on the other hand, assert that the will did not provide instruction regarding the payment of estate taxes for the IRAs and, therefore, insist the general rule of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. TX Far West, Ltd. v. Texas Investments Management, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  3. Vinson v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  4. Johnson v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Barker v. Rosenthal, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lesikar v. Moon, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  2. Heather Martin and John Brown v. Leonora Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2016
  3. Woody K. Lesikar, Individually and as Trustee of the Woodrow v. Lesikar Family Trust v. Carolyn Ann Lesikar Moon, Individually and as Named Trustee of the Carolyn Ann Lesikar Moon Special Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API