Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Barker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1943No. 30936Published

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Mae E. Barker, and others, as plaintiffs, and as the heirs, of John M. Barker, deceased, recovered a judgment in the district court of Cleveland county against Armour & Company, an Illinois corporation, adjudging them to be the owners of certain designated shares of stock in the defendant company and directing the defendant company to recognize their ownership thereof, or in lieu thereof, to pay them the sum of $950, the stipulated value of the stock, plus accumula¿ive dividends in the sum of $60.

Though relatively unimportant in connection with the legal principles which govern our…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Ada-Konawa Bridge Co. v. CargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Ex Parte CullinanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Hupfeld v. Automaton Piano Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
  5. Briggs v. StroudU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API