Legal Opinion
Union Trust Co. v. Simpson
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.
The plaintiff is the owner of a bond and mortgage executed to it by the defendants Simpson, the payment of which mortgage has been assumed by the other defendants. The whole of the principal sum which, according to the terms of the bond and mortgage became due on November 4, 1930, is unpaid. There are also unpaid installments of interest due upon the principal of the bond and mortgage.
The plaintiff asks that it be determined in this action whether if it shall obtain a judgment for the unpaid interest due upon the principal of the bond and mortgage or for the amount paid by it for taxes levied…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nesbit v. Riverside Independent DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Post v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Klinke v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Post v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Johnson v. MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Black v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- White v. Wielandt, New York County Courts1939
- Dutko v. Kocis, New York County Courts1943
- Rolfe v. WalkerNew York Supreme Court · 1946