Legal Opinion

In re H.W.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1994No. 94-CA-0406PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JiPLOTKIN, Judge.

Petitioner, Department of Health and Hospitals (“Department”), filed for a judicial commitment of H.W., which was granted by the trial court. The Mental Health Advocacy Service (“MHAS”), appointed to represent H.W., appeals. We conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support judicial commitment of H.W. and thus affirm.

*227 FACTS

H.W. is a 48-year-old man who.has lived with his' parents for approximately the last five years. On January 14, 1994, H.W. suffered a psychotic episode. His mother reported that she heard banging on the walls of H.W.’s room and he said, “If I ask…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. In re L.M.S.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re J.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. In Re Erin B.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. In Re HWLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. In re J.G.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Judicial Commitment of FBSRLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API