Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1898PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant company was indicted for an unlawful discrimination in the transportation of passengers, under section 4, chapter 320, Laws 1891 — the Railroad Commission Act. Section 4 of that act is in the following words: "That if any common carrier subject to the provisions of this act shall directly or indirectly, by any special rate, rebate, drawback or other device, charge, demand, collect, or receive from any person or persons a greater or less compensation for any service rendered or to be rendered in the transportation of passengers or property subject to the provisions of this act…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. State v. . DownsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. State v. . McBrayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. State v. . VoightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. State v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. . FalknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. State v. FalknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. John v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. QuinnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API