Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Kuczkowski v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 14, 1982Published

1Dissent

Kane, J. P., and Levine, J., dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum by Kane, J. P. Kane, J. P. (dissenting).

We are not persuaded that this record supports the board’s finding of an occupational disease. First, the record clearly demonstrates that the hernia and hydrocele required treatment over a long period of years. They were symptomatic during the period prior to the ultimate surgery in January, 1978. This court has said on prior occasions that compensation is not payable for the aggravation of a previously active condition (Matter of Webb v Western Elec. Co., 64 AD2d 744;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Claim of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Claim of Perez v. Pearl-Wick Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Webb v. Western Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API