Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Board of Regents - UW System v. Jeffrey S. Decker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2014No. 2011AP002902Published

1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.

¶ 54. (concurring). Everyone involved in the instant case — including the Board of Regents,1 Decker, and this court2 — agrees *834that the circuit court's harassment injunction does not pass muster: the scope of the injunction is impermissibly broad. The majority opinion correctly asserts that the circuit court's harassment injunction fails to identify the protected party and fails to specify the conduct to be enjoined.3

¶ 55. Because the injunction is overbroad, the injunction is invalid.4 On remand, the circuit court must refine the injunction and clarify its terms. Majority op., ¶ 3. In effect,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bachowski v. SalamoneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. City of Madison v. BaumannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Crown Castle USA, Inc. v. Orion Construction Group, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API