United States v. Slough
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*19 MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge
Before the Court are the defendants’ motions [Slough 441, 447; Slatten 17] to exclude evidence detailed in the government’s notice [Slough 406] of intention to introduce evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) (“Rule 404(b)”). Upon consideration of the defendants’ motions [Slough 441, 447; Slatten 17], the government’s opposition [Slough 481; Slatten 36], the defendants’ replies [Slough 492, 494; Slatten 41], the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court will DENY in part and GRANT in part the defendants’…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Bowie, JuanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Sarah Helen Williams Dollar v. Long Mfg., N. C., Inc., and Third-Party v. Nichols Tractor Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023