Legal Opinion

United States v. Slough

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 11, 2014No. Criminal No. 08-360(RCL), Criminal No. 14-107(RCL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*19 MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge

Before the Court are the defendants’ motions [Slough 441, 447; Slatten 17] to exclude evidence detailed in the government’s notice [Slough 406] of intention to introduce evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) (“Rule 404(b)”). Upon consideration of the defendants’ motions [Slough 441, 447; Slatten 17], the government’s opposition [Slough 481; Slatten 36], the defendants’ replies [Slough 492, 494; Slatten 41], the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court will DENY in part and GRANT in part the defendants’…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Bowie, JuanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  4. Sarah Helen Williams Dollar v. Long Mfg., N. C., Inc., and Third-Party v. Nichols Tractor Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API