Legal Opinion

Bernard Dresher v. Martin T. Cummings, 2850 River Road, Schenectady, New York, and Mary E. Cummings, 2850 River Road, Schenectady, New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 22, 1963No. 139, Docket 27762PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff and a passenger were injured when the automobile which plaintiff was driving collided with an automobile being operated by defendant, Mary E. Cummings. The jury found the defendant operator “guilty of negligence” and plaintiff “guilty of contributory negligence to a very minor degree.” The jury awarded damages to the passenger. A verdict of “no cause of action” was returned in plaintiff’s action. No objection was taken to the court’s charge and no error therein is claimed on appeal. The sole error argued is that the credible evidence established that the accident was not the result…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cummings v. DresherNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Cummings v. DresherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API