Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Purp Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1926No. Appeal, 36PublishedCited by 10 opinions

cited: Pocono Ice Co. v. Ice Co., 214 Pa. 640.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

In this case, plaintiff appeals from an order of the court below quashing the writ of summons, because issued against, and attempted to be served upon, a mining corporation which had theretofore been dissolved by a decree of court. He admits that, if the rule of the common law still applies, the decision below was right; but he points to a number of statutes, which he alleges compel a different conclusion. We do not so interpret them.

The Act of June 8,1874, P. L. 278, provides: “That all corporations for mining, manufacturing or trading purposes, whether created…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mumma v. Potomac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. Davidson, Exrx. v. BrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Gratz v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Citizens' Savings & Trust Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Pocono Spring Water Ice Co. v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boocks's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Merwine v. Mt. Pocono Light & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Erdely v. Hinchcliffe and Keener, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Mount Union Borough v. KunzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Beloit Iron Works v. LockhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API