Erskine v. Johnson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Tried below before Chapman, J. Abbott v. Qatch, 13 Md., 314. Miller v. MeOaffrey, 9 Penn. State, 245. Trustees v. Platt, 5 Brad., 567. Puff v Pinaldo, 55 N. Y., 664. McConey v. Wallace, 22 Mo. App., 377. 2 Sutherland Damages, 490. Dermott v. Jones, 2 Wall., 1. Escott v. White, 10 Bush., 169. Morrisey v. Schindler, 18 Neb., 672. Clarice v. Pope, 70 111., 128. Lovelock v. King, 1 M. & E., 60. Goldsmith v. Eland, 26 Ohio State, 101.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
Johnson brought an action against Erskine to recover the sum of $46.48 balance on a contract for the erection of a frame dwelling-house; $5.00 for extra work in grading around said house; and for altering a cellar window and one bay-window, $9.00.
Erskine in his answer admits that there is due the plaintiff on the contract the sum of $45.82. As a counterclaim Erskine alleges that Johnson was to complete the building on the 1st day of January, 1886, but that he failed to do so until the middle of March of that year, to Erskine’s damage in the sum of $62.60. Second, that the painting of the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Capitol Hotel Co. v. RittenberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Nelson v. JenkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Fuchs v. Parsons Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Carter v. A. I. Root, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. HelleksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.