Legal Opinion

Nance v. Countess

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1918No. 8 Div. 486PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; R. C. Briekell, Judge. Action in assumpsit by Thomas J. Countess against Mrs. Arthur H. Nance, as executrix of Sarah L. Townsend, deceased. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Most of the facts and charges sufficiently appear.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; R. C. Briekell, Judge. Action in assumpsit by Thomas J. Countess against Mrs. Arthur H. Nance, as executrix of Sarah L. Townsend, deceased. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Most of the facts and charges sufficiently appear. Charge 19, refused to defendant, is as follows: The court instructs the jury as a matter of law that, even if Sarah,L. Townsend went over the account for 1910¡ in the spring or summer of 1910, and promised to pay the same, they would be not authorized to find for plaintiff for the part of the account for nursing P.…

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

There are four counts in the complaint: First, on open account; second, on account stated; third, for work and labor done; and fourth, for money had and received. To these counts were interposed the plea of the general issue and the statute of limitations of three years to all of the counts except the second, and to the second, the statute of limitations of six years. The defendant was appointed and qualified as executrix, etc., in August, 1914. The verified account in favor of the plaintiff was duly filed with the executrix on the 5th day of April, 1915, and suit was brought on the 16th day…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sanders v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Alabama Steel & Wire Co. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Pollack v. Gunter & GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Caruthers v. Mardis' adm'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  5. State v. O'HaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Car Center, Inc. v. HOME INDEM. CO., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Home Indemnity Co. v. Ball-Co Contractors, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1986
  3. Ali Kamran QureshiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2023
  4. Creamer v. DoddAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Premier, LLC v. JAS TransportersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API