Legal Opinion

Milligan v. City of Alhambra

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1930No. Docket No. 7699PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCE,

J.—Plaintiff brought an action against defendant City of Alhambra to recover the sum of $5,050 alleged .to be due as a real estate agent’s commission. The action was tried by the court sitting without a jury upon an agreed stipulation of facts and from a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.

In November, 1926, notice was published stating that the cities of Pasadena, South Pasadena and Alhambra would receive sealed bids for their respective interests in property known as the Tri-City Farm. The city of Pasadena owned an undivided four-sixths interest in the property, while…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Frick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Times Publishing Co. v. WeatherbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. City of Astoria v. American La France Fire Engine Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  5. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Palo and Dodini v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Murphy v. Campbell Soup Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API