Brown v. American Stores, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentHood, Associate Judge
The effect of the majority opinion is that while Section 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 permits an overcharged consumer to bring an action for $50, where the overcharge trebled does not exceed that sum, he is entitled to recover only such sum, not exceeding $50, as the trial court or jury thinks proper under all the circumstances of the case. I am unable to find anything in the Act which justifies this interpretation.
In Hall v. Chaltis the majority opinion discussed this question, but I did not think such discussion necessary to the decision of that case. There, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.