Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Merriman

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Upon resubmission of the motion plaintiff contends that this is not a judgment creditor’s action under the Civil Practice Act but a creditor’s action under sections 278 and 279 of the Debtor and Creditor Law (added by Laws of 1925, chap. 254), which are as follows:

“ § 278. Rights of creditors whose claims have matured. 1. Where a conveyance or obligation is fraudulent as to a creditor, such creditor, when his claim has matured, may, as against any person except a purchaser for fair consideration without knowledge of the fraud at the time of the purchase, or one who has derived title…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rinchey v. . StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Hess v. . HessNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Beardsley Scythe Co. v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. McNeal v. Hayes Machine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. ConnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. St. Johnland Nursing Home, Inc. v. Perlman, New York County Courts1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API