Legal Opinion

Smith v. Plant

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 31, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This action was brought to recover a five per cent commission on the price received by the defendant from the United Shoe Machinery Company for a sale to it of his patents and shares in the capital stock of the Thomas G. Plant Company.

Certain facts were not in dispute. Before the matters here in suit took place there were no business relations between the plaintiff and .the defendant. Their acquaintance grew out of their exhibiting horses at fairs and horse shows. It seems to have been common knowledge that the defendant was an antagonist as well as a competitor of the United Shoe Machinery…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Cadigan v. CrabtreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Smith v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Elliott v. KazajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Davidson v. RobieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  3. Lyman Loring Brooks v. GregoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Fenton v. Federal Street Building TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Hutchinson v. PlantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API