Legal Opinion

In re Torrez v. Torrez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 1987No. 86-2079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

In this case we decide whether, in the context of a bankruptcy proceeding, a resulting trust may survive a challenge of illegal purpose under California law. At stake is who is entitled to a parcel of land: the purchasers, who attempted to circumvent federal reclamation law by putting title in the names of their children; or those children, who never paid for the land but nonetheless seek to wrest it from their parents. We reject the children’s theory of illegal purpose, hold in favor of the parents and affirm.

I

The facts are not in dispute. On January 15, 1975, John and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. In the Matter of Pizza of Hawaii, Inc., Debtor. Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. In Re American Mariner Industries, Inc., Debtor. Crocker National Bank v. American Mariner Industries, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Massoud Bassidji v. Simon Soul Sun GoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. In Re TorrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Jbassidji v. GoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API