United States v. Quam
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the objections by defendant Kerry Jon Quam to the July 21, 2015, report and recommendation (R & R) of Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. The magistrate judge recommended that the court deny Quam’s objections to the court’s post-judgment writ of garnishment. Quam objects to the R & R.
The court reviews the report and recommendation de novo. _ 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b). After a review of the file and record, the court finds that the report and recommendation is thorough,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. David E. KinlockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. EkongCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. JamesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.