Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gulledge v. Wester

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 2018No. 01-17-00488-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceJustice Higley

Attachment

APPENDIX I

CONCURRING OPINION

Laura Carter Higley, Justice *821The majority does not reach whether blocking the view of another landowner is actionable as a nuisance claim. Instead, the majority holds that, even if such a claim is actionable, Wester and Sullivan did not provide legally sufficient evidence to support the claim. I take a different approach. I would hold that blocking a view of another landowner is not actionable under nuisance law. As a result, I express no opinion on what amount of evidence would be sufficient if it were actionable. Accordingly, I concur in the judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Holubec v. BrandenbergerTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Rankin v. FPL ENERGY, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2008
  4. Shamburger v. ScheurrerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Jones v. Highland Memorial ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API