Legal Opinion · Dissent

Daniel K. Mayers v. Peter S. Ridley

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 1972No. 71-1418Published

1DissentTamm, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my opinion for the division of this court, attached hereto as an appendix.

APPENDIX

TAMM, Circuit Judge:

Appellants, homeowners in the District of Columbia whose deeds contain racially restrictive covenants, brought a class action suit in the District Court against the Recorder of Deeds and the Commissioner of the District of Columbia1 on their own behalf and on behalf of all District of Columbia homeowners similarly situated. They alleged that the Recorder’s actions in accepting for filing, and maintaining public records of restrictive…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API