Legal Opinion

Park v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1926No. Docket No. 83PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). Appellee' in its brief seeks to raise some questions touching the validity of the liens. These liens were sustained in the decree entered in the court below and appellee has not appealed. The rule is too well established to need citation of authorities that one who has not appealed can not here ask for a reversal of the decree. We pass the minor questions raised by appellant, as we are satisfied its principal contention must be sustained. The appellee agreed to pay the contractor Boyle $8,-000 for a completed building. There was no provision for any payment as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. American Blower Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Roman v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co. v. Texas Building Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. RitterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ramada Development Company, a Corporation v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API