Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. Davies

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1914No. 11770PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered December 13, 1913, enjoining a tax, upon overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This is an action by a taxpayer, to restrain the officials of the county of Snohomish from extending upon the assessment rolls of the county any taxes in excess of ten mills on the dollar. The city of Snohomish assumed the defense, and interposed a general demurrer to the complaint. The demurrer was overruled, and a decree was entered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

The city of Snohomish is a city of the third class. In October, 1913, an ordinance was passed and approved levying a tax of fifteen mills on the dollar on all property, real and personal, within the city…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Wolfe v. ParmenterWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Gasch v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Fletcher v. PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Heilig v. City Council of PuyallupWashington Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Toll Bridge Auth. v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State Ex Rel. Gebhardt v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State Ex Rel. Hansen v. SalterWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State Ex Rel. Scofield v. EasterdayWashington Supreme Court · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API