Legal Opinion

People v. Hampton

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1999No. B120730PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.

Introduction

Appellant Charles Hampton robbed a Burger King restaurant; appellant Darrell Williams drove the getaway car. Tried jointly, they were both convicted by a jury of robbery, with findings as to Hampton that he personally used a firearm, and as to Williams that a principal was armed with a firearm.

The court admitted into evidence Hampton’s custodial confession to police concerning his commission of the robbery, with instructions to the jury that it was not admissible against Williams. Hampton’s confession was carefully edited to omit any mention of Williams…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. VinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. ErvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. Andrew Khac VuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. ErvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API