Legal Opinion

Fedeli v. UAP/Ga. Ag. Chem., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1999No. A98A2285PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Gino Fedeli sued UAP/Ga. Ag. Chem., Inc. (UAP) for money had and received, alleging that UAP improperly received certain checks from third parties representing payments that were actually due to Fedeli. UAP moved for summary judgment, asserting the defenses of res judicata and holder in due course. The trial court granted UAP’s motion for summary judgment, and Fedeli appeals. For reasons discussed below, we affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the court, viewing all the evidence and drawing all reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to the respondent, concludes…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Fowler v. VineyardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Hodge v. SADA Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Morrissette v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Piedmont Cotton Mills, Inc. v. WoelperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. QOS Networks Ltd. v. Warburg, Pincus & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Kauffman v. Eastern Food & Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Bostick v. Cmm Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  4. Myers v. North Georgia Title & Tax Free Exchange, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Edmondson v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API