Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd v. Chiaro Technology Ltd
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 SHENZHEN ROOT TECHNOLOGY Co., CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00631-JHC 8 Ltd., ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 Plaintiff, RECONSIDERATION 10 v. 11 CHIARO TECHNOLOGY Ltd., 12 Defendant. 13 14 I 15 INTRODUCTION 16 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for reconsideration. Dkt. # 53. The Court 17 DENIES the motion. 18 II 19 DISCUSSION 20 A. Reconsideration of Merits Determination 21 The Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order largely because the 22 Court concluded that the harm alleged was not so…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- A.V. v. Panama-Buena Vista Union Sch. Dist.District Court, E.D. California · 2017