Legal Opinion

Miller v. Union Assur. Soc., Limited, of London, England

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1930No. 8617, 8618PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

Under the rule of conventional subrogation the appellee was granted a decree for the recovery of a specified sum of money against the appellant. To satisfy said decree, the court below adjudged same a lien against certain real estate which was ordered sold.

Appellee was engaged in the fire insurance business and issued its two policies of insurance in the sum of $2,000 and $8,000, respectively, to the appellant. These policies were issued for a period of one year, expiring in March, 1926. By their terms they un dertook to assure the appellant against direct loss or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Liverpool & London Insurance v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lyons Milling Co. v. Goffe & Carkener, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Woods-Faulkner & Co. v. MichelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Otoe County Nat. Bank v. DelanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  4. Patriotic Ins. Co. of America v. FranciscusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Skidmore v. Star Insurance Co. of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API