Legal Opinion

Lapique v. Monroe

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1912No. Civ. No. 1103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

The first cause of action is one for malicious prosecution; that is to say, the matters alleged approach more nearly a statement of a cause of action of that character than of any other. In substance, it is alleged that certain of defendants conspired together to charge and prosecute plaintiff for a public offense of which he alleges he is innocent. He was, however, bound over by the magistrate, tried by a jury and convicted, which judgment was subsequently reversed by this court. A second cause of action is attempted to be stated under section 1505 of the Penal Code, which section provides a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. GodfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Lamb v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API