Video Aid Corp. v. Town of Wallkill
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ClPARICK, J.
Plaintiffs remitted $27,000 to defendant in satisfaction of sewer and water tap-in fees due in conjunction with their *665application for a building permit to proceed with their planned renovation of new business premises in Wallkill. The fees, adopted by defendant in response to mandates imposed by the State and Federal governments to upgrade WallkiU’s sewer and water systems, were subsequently declared unconstitutional and plaintiffs were awarded a judgment in the amount of the fees paid plus interest, costs and disbursements. On this appeal, defendant challenges…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Adrico Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Mercury Machine Importing Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Tripler v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- City of Rochester v. ChiarellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Corporate Property Investors v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Walton v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Matteawan On Main, Inc. v. City of BeaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Trager v. Town of Clifton ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Phillips v. Town of Clifton Park Water AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. CHAUTAUQUA COUNTYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.