Legal Opinion

LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. Shearon

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph J. Maltese, J.

This court has denied the plaintiff bank’s summary judgment motion in a mortgage foreclosure action because it has found that the original lender has violated the “predatory lending” statutes found in Banking Law § 6-1. As a result of the findings of violations of the predatory lending sections of the Banking Law this court grants the defendant homeowner summary judgment wherein he may be entitled to damages to include the voiding of the mortgage and loan, along with the return of all mortgage payments, the expenses of obtaining the loans and attorney…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Wiener v. Ga-Ro Die Cutting Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Dino & Artie's Automatic Transmission Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Gorman v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. ShearonNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Sovereign Bank v. Gawron, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API