Legal Opinion
Castro v. Russi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 9, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination to revoke petitioner’s parole is supported by substantial evidence. It was within the Hearing Officer’s province to disregard petitioner’s version as incredible (see, Matter of Madlock v Russi, 195 AD2d 646, 647; People ex rel. Pastore v Dalsheim, 88 AD2d 665, 666). There is no support in the record for petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officer was biased, and no proof that the outcome flowed from the alleged bias (see, Matter of Hughes v Suffolk County Dept. of Civ. Serv., 74 NY2d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MATTER OF HUGHES v. Suffolk County Dep't of Civil Serv.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People ex rel. Johnson v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Madlock v. RussiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People ex rel. Pastore v. DalsheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- People ex rel. Fryer v. BeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Westcott v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hampton v. KirkpatrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- HAMPTON, JR., FRANKLIN v. KIRKPATRICK, ROBERT A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People ex rel. Fryer v. BeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002