Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Parker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 17, 1969No. 45,339PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an action for damages arising from personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff who was about to enter the automobile of the defendant. The trial court sustained the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground the plaintiff was a guest within the meaning of K. S. A. 8-122b, which required the showing of gross and wanton negligence as a basis for recovery, gross and wanton negligence not having been alleged by the plaintiff in her amended petition. Appeal has been duly perfected by the plaintiff.

The only question…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ehrsam v. BorgenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Estates of Wright v. PizelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Smith v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Marsh v. HogeboomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. Rainsbarger v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Henry Ex Rel. Henry v. BauderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Jewett v. KosydarOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Hale v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Colin v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Roe v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API