Legal Opinion

County of Muskegon v. Michigan Surety Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933No. Docket No. 28, Calendar No. 36,885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

County of Muskegon, plaintiff, brought suit against the Michigan Surety Company, defendant, upon a depository bond of $20,000. On October 22, 1930, the board of supervisors of the county designated the Peoples State Bank for Savings of Muskegon, Michigan, as depository for the funds of the county of Muskegon for the years 1931 ánd 1932, the bank agreeing to furnish a surety bond in the amount of $300,000 to secure deposits made by the county. The bank was unable to furnish such bonds, and, on January 20,1931, a redesignation was made, whereby the National Lumbermen’s Bank of Muskegon and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. American Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Grinnell Realty Co. v. General Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Township of Forest v. American Bonding Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. County of Oakland v. Central West Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Commissioner of Insurance v. Central West Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bunker v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
  5. Sparks v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API