Legal Opinion

Newbaker v. Lanier

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1986No. 85-1181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Judge.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether or not the trial court erred in finding a used car dealership liable for arranging the sale of an automobile and allegedly making a false representation about the automobile.

Kandace Newbaker (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) filed suit against Eugene D. Lanier, Inc., d/b/a Acadian Toyota (hereinafter referred to as Acadian) and Betty Zeno (hereinafter referred to as Zeno) for reimbursement of the purchase price of a 1970 model Volkswagen due to redhibitory defects allegedly present and not disclosed at the time of the sale of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Devore v. Hobart Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Josephs v. AustinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Beal v. Lomas and Nettleton Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Castille v. FolckLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Wiltz v. Dixie Auto Sales, IncorporatedLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ahrens v. TPLC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1997
  2. Slaughter v. GuinnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Randy Richards, et al. v. Amazon.com Sales, Inc., et al.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API