Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 29, 1941No. Docket No. 99227PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1. A purchase in 1934 by a corporation, which was not in existence in 1913, of one-tenth of its outstanding shares for a price in excess of one-tenth of its paid-in capital, held to absorb accumulated earnings and profits in the amount of such excess. 2. A distribution in 1935 in an amount greater than the earnings and profits acquired after exhaustion by distribution in 1934, held, to the extent of such excess, not taxable as a dividend, but properly chargeable to capital…

Read the full summary

1. A purchase in 1934 by a corporation, which was not in existence in 1913, of one-tenth of its outstanding shares for a price in excess of one-tenth of its paid-in capital, held to absorb accumulated earnings and profits in the amount of such excess. 2. A distribution in 1935 in an amount greater than the earnings and profits acquired after exhaustion by distribution in 1934, held, to the extent of such excess, not taxable as a dividend, but properly chargeable to capital account. Foster v. United States,303 U.S. 118, distinguished.

1Opinion of the Court

*443OPINION.

Steknhagen:

1. Petitioner contends that the later 1935 dividends were traceable in part to Acheson Corporation’s capital and paid-in surplus because its accumulated earnings had been exhausted by prior distributions. The circumstances of the 1934 distribution were as follows: "

The Acheson Corporation was organized in 1915, with a capital stock of $1,000,000, represented by 10,000 shares, all of which were issued to Edward G. Acheson. It began with a paid-in surplus of $911,499.66. Petitioner insists that the distribution of $f¿6fijlfl0 in June 1934 served to reduce by $1,060,000 the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foster v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Helvering v. CanfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Enoch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  2. Maloney v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Anderson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  4. Helvering v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  5. Van Clief v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API