Legal Opinion

Luther v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1909No. 16,245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Harlan county: Harry S. Uungan, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

November 14, 1906, plaintiff in error was fined $500 and the costs of prosecution for violating the Slocumb law. Upon appeal to this court that judgment was affirmed. 83 Neb. 455. The district court upon receipt of our mandate ordered an execution issued, to be levied upon defendant’s goods and chattels, and, for want thereof, upon his body, for the satisfaction of the judgment. The writ was issued and Luther committed to jail, and he again appeals to this court, contending that, since the district court, in 1906, did not order him to remain in jail until the judgment was satisfied, it could…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Luther v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re LockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Marasco v. MundellNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Raker v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API