Legal Opinion

Stamper v. Freebird Logistics Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 28, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00155Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Gregory Stamper, No. CV-22-00155-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Freebird Logistics Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Gregory Stamper moves for default judgment against Defendants Freebird 16 Logistics, Inc. and Jeffrey Larsen (collectively, “Defendants”), pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 11.) The Defendants have not appeared or 18 filed any response. For the reasons discussed below, the motion for default judgment is 19 granted and Stamper is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  4. In Re Balbir Singh Tuli, Debtor. Balbir Singh Tuli v. Republic of IraqCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Newgen, LLC v. Safe Cig, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API